Communicative Language
Teaching (CLT) is
an approach to the teaching of second and foreign languages, emphasizes
interaction as both the means and the ultimate goal of learning a language. It
is also referred to as “Communicative Approach”. Historically, CLT has been
seen as a response to the Audio-Lingual Method (ALM), and as an extension or
development of the Notional-Functional Syllabus. Task-based language learning,
a more recent refinement of CLT, has gained considerably in popularity.
For Chomsky the focus of linguistics
was to describe the linguistic competence that enables speakers to
produce grammatically correct sentences. Dell Hymes held, however, that
such a view of linguistic theory was sterile and that it failed to picture all
the aspects of language. He advocated the need of a theory that incorporates communication
competence. It must be a definition of what a speaker needs to know in
order to be communicatively competent in a speech community. Later Canale and
Swaine (1980) described four dimensions of communicative competence.
- Grammatical
     competence: refers to what Chomsky calls
     linguistic competence.
 - Sociolinguistic
     competence: refers to an understanding of
     the social context in which communication takes place (role relationships,
     shared beliefs and information between participants …)
 - Discourse
     competence: refers to the interpretation
     of individual message elements in terms of their interconnectedness and
     how meaning is represented in relationship to the entire discourse or
     text.
 - Strategic
     competence: refers to the coping strategies
     that participants use to initiate terminate, maintain, repair and redirect
     communication
 
Learning
theory
According to the communicative
approach, in order for learning to take place, emphasis must be put on the
importance of these variables:
- Communication: activities that involve real
     communication promote learning.
 - Tasks: An activity in which language is used to carry
     out meaningful tasks supports the learning process.
 - Meaning: language that is meaningful and authentic to
     the learner boosts learning.
 
Acquiring
or learning?
Stephen Krashen later advocated in
his language learning theory that there should be a distinction between learning
and acquiring. He sees acquisition as the basic process involved in
developing language proficiency and distinguishes this process from learning.
Acquisition is an unconscious process that involves the naturalistic
development of language proficiency while learning is the conscious
internalization of the rules of language. It results in explicit knowledge
about the forms of language and the ability to verbalize this knowledge.
Learning according to Krashen cannot lead to acquisition.
Syllabus
Communicative language teaching
syllabus organizes the teaching according to the notional and functional
categories of language rather than according to its structures. It concentrates
on the following:
- Interactions: using  language to communicate,
 - Tasks: using language to  perform meaningful tasks
 - Learner: putting the learner’s interests needs in the
     forefront.
 
Characteristics of
the teaching/learning process
- The most obvious characteristic of CLT is that almost everything that is done is done with communicative intent.
 - Another characteristic of CLT is the use of authentic materials. Whenever possible, ‘authentic language’-- language as it is used in a real context -- should be introduced.
 - Activities in CLT are often carried out by students in small groups.
 
Merits
of CLT
There are many advantages in
teaching according to the communicative approach:
- CLT is a holistic approach. It doesn’t focus only on
     the traditional structural syllabus. It takes into consideration
     communicative dimension of language.
 - CLT provides vitality and motivation within the
     classroom.
 - CLT is a learner centered approach. It capitalizes on
     the interests and needs of the learner.
 - In a world where communication of information and
     information technology has broken new considerable ground, CLT can play an
     important role in education.
 
Criticism
- Notional syllabus was criticized as merely replacing
     one kind of list, namely a list of grammatical structures, with another
     list of notions and functions.
 - The various categories of language functions are
     overlapping and not systematically graded like the structures of the
     language.
 - The communicative approach focuses on the use of
     language in everyday situations, or the functional aspects of language,
     and less on the formal structures. There must be a certain balance between
     the two. It gives priority to meanings and rules of use rather than to
     grammar and rules of structure.  Such concentration on language
     behavior may result in negative consequences in the sense that important
     structures and rules would be left out.
 - The approach relies extensively on the
     functional-notational syllabus which places heavy demands on the learners.
 - A major principle underlying this approach is its
     emphasis on learners’ needs and interests. This implies that every teacher
     should modify the syllabus to fit the needs of the learners.
 - The requirements are difficult. Not all classrooms can
     allow for group work activities and for teaching aids and materials.
 
In spite of its critics, CLT has
gained widespread acceptance in the world of language study. CLT can succeed,
as long as teachers don’t completely reject the need for the structure provided
by grammar. Teachers must strive for moderation and shouldn’t neglect the
merits of other methods. CLT, in the hands of a balanced teacher, can bring new
life and joy to the classroom. Its vitality makes it an important contributor
to language learning approaches.
Teaching
  Material 
 | 
  
Authentic
  materials 
 | 
 ||
Objectives 
 | 
  
Speaking 
 | 
 ||
Class 
 | 
  
8 
 | 
  
No.
  of Students 
 | 
  
30/40 
 | 
 
Goal 
 | 
  
Communicate
  in the Target Language 
 | 
  
Time 
 | 
  
45
  minutes 
 | 
 
Teaching
  Methods 
 | 
  
Communicative
  Language Teaching (CLT) 
 | 
  
Teaching
  Aids 
 | 
  
Handout 
Worksheets 
Picture 
Visual
  aids 
 | 
 
Analysis
  of 
Students’ 
Background 
 | 
  
1.     
  Students are in the 8th 
2.     
  Ss are able to listen to and speak classroom
  English and conversation in daily life. 
            3.      Ss are willing
  to answer questions. 
 | 
 ||
Lesson Objectives
 | 
 |
Aim:  To foster students’ speaking skills in the
  classroom by creating a ‘real-life’ communicative setting. 
 | 
 |
Specific Objectives
 | 
 |
      ·        
  Develop student’s speaking skills      
      ·        
  Encourage asking and giving
  directions in English 
      ·        
  Develop student’s speaking micro
  skills 
 | 
  
      ·        
  Raise students communicative
  skills 
      ·        
  Achieve skills integration 
      ·        
  Enhance students collaboration 
 | 
 
Teacher’s Role 
 | 
  
Student’s Role 
 | 
 
    Ø  Facilitator 
    Ø  Advisor  
    Ø  Less dominant than
  teacher-centered  
 | 
  
    Ø  Ss are communicators. 
    Ø  Engaged in negotiating meaning 
    Ø 
  Try
  to make themselves understood and in understanding others.  
 | 
 
Language and
  Culture View 
 | 
  
Language Skills 
 | 
 
    Ø 
  Language
  is for communication.  
    Ø 
  Culture
  is the everyday lifestyle of people who use the language. 
 | 
  
    Ø 
  Language
  functions might be emphasized over forms. 
    Ø 
  Ss
  work with language at the suprasentential or discourse level.    
    Ø 
  Ss
  work on all four skills from the beginning.   
   
 | 
 
Students’ Native Language 
 | 
  
Student’s Feeling 
 | 
 
   Ø 
  Whenever
  possible, the TL should be used.   
 | 
  
   Ø 
  Ss
  will be more motivated to study FL. 
   Ø 
  T
  will give opportunity to express Ss individuality. 
   Ø 
  T
  will give Ss opportunity for cooperative interaction. 
 | 
 
Techniques 
 | 
  
Interactions 
 | 
 
   Ø  Authentic materials 
   Ø  Scrambled sentences 
   Ø  Language game 
   Ø  Picture strip story 
   Ø  Role play 
 | 
  
   Ø  T-Ss 
   Ø 
  Ss-Ss 
 | 
 
Evaluation 
 | 
  
Respond to Errors 
 | 
 
   Ø  Accuracy and fluency  
   Ø  S who has the most control of
  the structures and vocabulary is not always the best communicator. 
   Ø    
 | 
  
   Ø 
  Tolerated
   
 | 
 
N.B. TL (Target Language), FL (Foreign Language)
Lesson Plan
Time 45m 
 | 
  
Stage 
 | 
  
Aim 
 | 
  
Procedure 
 | 
  
Interaction 
 | 
 |
3m 
 | 
  
Warm-up 
 | 
  
ü 
  To
  make Ss more comfortable. 
 | 
  
- Greeting &
  introduction. 
- Telling a story
  related with the topic/ summarizes the previous class. 
- Declaration of
  the lesson. 
 | 
  
T-Ss 
 | 
 |
12m 
 | 
  
Activity 1 
Picture strip story  
 | 
  
ü 
  To
  promote communication. 
ü 
  To
  work on negotiating meaning.  
 | 
  
- T will ask Ss
  to divide into small groups. 
- One member of
  the group will be given a picture strip story. 
- The S with the
  strip story will show the first picture to other members of his group, while
  covering the remaining five pictures. 
-  The other Ss will try to predict what they
  think will happen in the second picture. 
- The first S
  will tell them whether they are correct or not and continues. 
 | 
  
T-Ss 
Ss-Ss 
 | 
 |
12m 
 | 
  
Activity 2 
Authentic
  text 
Scrambled
  sentences  
 | 
  
ü 
  To
  figure out the speaker’s or writer’s intentions is part of being
  communicatively competent.  
ü 
  To
  create variety of linguistic forms.  
ü 
  To
  make TL as a vehicle for classroom communication.  
 | 
  
- T will
  distribute a handout written on both sides.  
- One
  side is a copy of a sports column from a recent newspaper.  
- T will tell Ss to read it and
  underline reporter’s prediction.  
- When Ss have finished, they
  will read what they have underlined. And T will write the prediction on the
  board. 
- Then T and Ss discuss and say
  which predictions they think the reporter feels more certain of and least
  certain of. 
- T will give directions for
  the activity in the TL. 
- Ss will try to state the
  reporter’s predictions in different words.  
 | 
  
T-Ss 
 | 
 |
- T will tell Ss to unscramble
  the sentences of the newspaper article. 
 | 
  |||||
ü 
  To
  teach cohesion and coherence properties. 
 | 
  
- Next T will ask Ss to turn
  the other side of the handout where the sentences of the article
  are out of order. 
 | 
  ||||
15m 
 | 
  
Activity
  3 
Language
  games 
 | 
  
ü 
  To
  learn real communicative events-purpose to the exchange. 
ü 
  To
  aware them by giving immediate feedback. 
ü 
  To
  work on negotiating meaning. 
 | 
  
- T will announce
  to play a game and divide the class into small groups. 
- T will give
  each group a deck of 12 cards and each card has a picture. 
- Ss will
  identify the items and T will write each name on the board. 
- The cards are
  shuffled and four Ss in a group are dealt 3 cards each without showing to
  anyone else. 
- The extra card
  is placed face down in the middle of the group. 
- 5th
  person in each group receives no card and s/he has a choice as to what she
  would predict and how s/he would predict it. 
- S/he will
  receive feedback from the group members and continues. 
 | 
  
T-Ss 
Ss-Ss 
 | 
 |
3m 
 | 
  
Warp-up 
Writing 
 | 
  
ü 
  To
  engage Ss at home. 
 | 
  
- T will instruct
  Ss to listen to a debate on the radio or watch it on television as home work. 
 | 
  
T-Ss 
 | 
 
Assessment
Scoring criteria 
No. 
 | 
  
Name of the Ss 
 | 
  
Fluency 
 | 
  
Accuracy 
 | 
 ||||||
Descriptor
Fluency:
4:  speak fluently with no
hesitation and correct intonation. (Know when to pause and to stop)
3: speak fluently enough with little
hesitation, there but the intonation still correct  
2: not speak fluently enough (too
much hesitation) and the intonation is not really correct.
1: not speak fluently and lack of
intonation appropriateness. 
Accuracy:
4: no grammar error and use
appropriate vocabulary
3: some grammar error and use
appropriate vocabulary
2: some grammar error and the use of
vocabulary is not really appropriate
1: many grammar error and
inappropriate vocabulary
References
H. Douglas Brown
(1987).Principles of language learning and teaching. Englewood Cliffs, New
Jersey, Prentice Hall
Richards, Jack C.
and Theodore S. Rodgers (1986). Approaches and methods in language
teaching: A description and analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press
Hughes, Arthur. (1983). Testing
for Language Teachers. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Madsen,
H. S. (1983). Techniques in testing. Oxford University Press.
Picture
Strip Story
Language Game
Scramble
Sentences 
1.     
  They were the
  most perhaps batsmen experienced. 
 | 
 
2.     
  The painful
  tigers defeat suffered their most.  
 | 
 
3.     
  Mushfiqur of
  those the need was for never wracking moments.  
 | 
 
4.     
  A short ball
  he hit at mid-wicket straight to the fielder.  
 | 
 
5.     
  A small piece
  to create of history the last three balls.  
 | 
 


very informative. thanks
ReplyDeleteVery interesting tasks.
ReplyDeleteThanks .
really helpfull and informative!
ReplyDeleteit help alot.thanks
ReplyDeletea great help. thank you
ReplyDelete